Vuzilkree An analysis of radical prostatectomy in advanced stage and high-grade prostate cancer. Estas operaciones duran de una hora y media a cuatro horas. Pero existen varias diferencias entre ambas pruebas. A full version is available at the EAU office or Web site www.

Author:Vutaxe Mim
Language:English (Spanish)
Genre:Personal Growth
Published (Last):4 December 2009
PDF File Size:12.2 Mb
ePub File Size:17.26 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Se compara cada grado con el sistema de Gleason original y se describen sus diferencias. Jonathan I. Epstein of the Johns Hopkins University JHU proposed a new prognostic classification of prostate cancer based on biochemical recurrence, which would more accurately reflect the biological aggressiveness of the tumor and fit current clinical recommendations. Methods: The review is based on a the original JHU study with the classification proposal, b the official publication of the International Society of Urological Pathology ISUP with the description of the new classification, c an extensive letter to the editor with additional comments on the ISUP conference, d another letter to the editor on the nomenclature of the new classification, and e a review of the literature to seek validation studies of the proposal of the classification.

Data analysis and integration: The review explains the origin of the new classification, as well as the features of each of the 5 prognostic grade groups. It compares each grade to the original Gleason system and describes its differences.

It discusses some controversial issues, such as the indolence of the Gleason score 6, the percentage of pattern 4, and how to communicate the Gleason tertiary patterns with the new classification. Finally, it reports a few validation studies of the new classification and describes the relation of the new classification with some molecular characteristics of the tumors.

Conclusions: The new classification of Grade Groups will help pathologists improve the classification of prostate cancer based on glandular morphology. It will also be useful for other clinicians, researchers and patients, as it presents a better correlation with the current management of the disease. Key words: Prostate; cancer; Gleason; classification; prognosis.

En , el doctor Jonathan I. En caso contrario, se descarta. En las tablas de Partin originales se agruparon los puntajes de Gleason en: , 5, 6, 7 y Agradecimientos El autor le agradece al Dr. Gleason DF. Classification of prostatic carcinomas.

Cancer Chemother Rep. Histopathology of localized prostate cancer. Stockholm, Sweden. May , Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. Am J Surg Pathol ;29 9 Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int. Am J Surg Pathol. Reply to letter to editor about new Gleason grading system: Statement from the editors of six journals [carta]. Urol Oncol. Epstein JI.

Prostate cancer grading: a contemporary photomontage [carta]. Prostate cancer grading: recent developments and future directions. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram Partin Tables based on cases from Gleason score adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: a diagnosis that should not be made.

A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy. Hum Pathol. Tracking the clonal origin of lethal prostate cancer. J Clin Invest. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason Grading system and factoring in tertiary grades. Eur Urol. J Urol.

Clinical utility of quantitative Gleason grading in prostate biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. Ann Surg Oncol. A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: A validated alternative to the Gleason score.

Impact of new Gleason grade grouping on pathological and clinical outcomes after radical prostatectomy [resumen]. Eur Urol Suppl. Independent validation of the prognostic capacity of the ISUP prostate cancer grade grouping system for radiation treated patients with long-term follow-up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome.

Br J Cancer. Predictive efficacy of the International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in initially diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Asian J Androl Aug New prostate cancer grading system predicts long-term survival following surgery for Gleason score prostate cancer.

Eur Urol Nov Genomic correlates to the newly proposed grading prognostic groups for prostate cancer. Perspectives of prostate cancer patients on Gleason scores and the new grade groups: Initial qualitative study. Prostate ;77 3 Recibido: 3 de diciembre de Aprobado: 2 de marzo de


Escore de Gleason

Pathological scores range from 2 through 10, with higher number indicating greater risks and higher mortality. If the prostate is surgically removed, a pathologist will slice the prostate for a final examination. Partin Tables Johns Hopkins Brady Urological Institute Published online June 18, The information on this page, while orostata at the time of publishing, may be subject to change escala gleason cancer prostata alterations. Glrason escore Gleason de 7 para cima, particularmente de 8 a Results and experience may vary from user to user.





La escala de Gleason indica la etapa del cáncer de próstata



Escala de Gleason


Related Articles